Successful placement sample exists
Agent88 now has a concrete report sample showing the campaign creative placed into real-looking am730 and HK01 desktop/mobile article contexts, including leaderboard, right rail, lower mobile, and in-article slots.
Report status
This page now records visible progress from the latest build: the agent can produce a clean sample placement report from campaign creative plus publisher-page contexts. Still human-reviewed before any client delivery.
Client metadata still required
The visual proofing loop is working, but a final RDS pack still needs confirmed advertiser name, campaign name, landing URL, approved publisher URLs, report period, and final template preference.
Not live ad-server capture yet
The current success is controlled placement proofing and report generation, not verified live served-ad capture. This is the right Phase 1 wedge for fast agency review and approval.
Latest successful report sample
This is the new proof of progress Clyde can show: one campaign creative applied across five publisher placements, packaged as a report-style visual sample instead of a loose screenshot dump.
Successful sample: am730 desktop leaderboard 728x90, am730 desktop right rail 300x250, am730 mobile lower 320x100, HK01 desktop right rail 300x250, and HK01 mobile in-article 300x250. This demonstrates the report agent can turn campaign assets and target page contexts into client-reviewable placement proof.
What is now working
Publisher-specific placement mockups are being generated with clearer slot discipline across desktop and mobile contexts, then collected into a presentable report sample.
Why this matters for RDS
The agency-facing wedge is now concrete: send banner creative plus target publisher contexts, receive a client-ready proof pack for approval instead of manually assembling screenshots.
Human review remains
Agent88 still labels outputs as controlled proof, keeps approval in the loop, and flags final metadata/page-context confirmation before client delivery.
Next upgrade
Map these successful samples back into the RDS PPT/report structure with campaign fields, launch dates, landing URL, and brand-safety notes.
Original report style
The original report cover has a rugged dark background and cyan-blue motif. We should preserve that character while showing the newer successful placement samples below.
Original PPTX cover reference. Note: the first-page background is intentionally rugged/textured, not a clean flat gradient; final report styling should preserve that rough premium look.
Guideline rules carried forward
- Cover must update Advertiser, Campaign, Date for every report.
- Content pages must show Platform, Ad Format, and Launch Date.
- GDN/ad-choice buttons must appear at the banner’s top-right corner.
- Use correct website ad frames; avoid native/out-stream placements for standard banners.
- Capture content/subpages, not homepage-only.
- Avoid negative news / unsafe adjacent content.
- Rich media needs video-style screenshot evidence, not just a static capture.
am730 correction
The am730 PPTX reference slide must be counted as three banner placements on one screenshot: one top leaderboard and two right-rail 300x250 rectangles.
Local image-processing detection: two exact 300x250 right-rail creatives plus a 90px-high top leaderboard creative area.
Verified count
1
Top leaderboardVisible horizontal banner placement at the top of the page. Detected creative area has 90px height.
2
Upper right railDetected 300x250 creative at approx x=1152, y=196.
3
Lower right railDetected 300x250 creative at approx x=1152, y=497.
Progress findings
Earlier outputs were internal milestones. The latest sample now gives us a credible client-review surface while keeping the correct controlled-proof caveat.
Phase 1 internal draft
Shows multiple proof variants, including am730 728x90 and am730 300x250, but as separate images rather than one template-faithful am730 reference slide with three placements visible together.
First live-site sample
Historical only. Prior QA found placement errors caused by visual composition rather than confirmed ad-slot/container placement.
Latest successful sample
Better placement discipline across am730 and HK01: top leaderboard, right rail, mobile lower slot, and mobile in-article placements. This is now suitable to show as process made, with controlled-proof labelling.
2026-05-10 static proof run
Cleanest controlled prototype: static assets, explicit slots, GDN overlay, contact sheet, QA checklist. Missing confirmed metadata and only renders 728x90, 300x250, and 320x100.
Review contact sheet assembled from existing Agent88 RDS proof outputs.
Next materials needed from RDS
The sample proves the direction. These are the minimum inputs needed to turn it into a final RDS-style client pack.
- Confirmed advertiser/client name.
- Confirmed campaign name.
- Report date or reporting period.
- Launch date or campaign period by placement.
- Landing URL / click-through URL.
- 2–3 approved publisher/site/page URLs for first static screencap draft.
- Confirmation that Maxim’s / Mother’s Day assets are acceptable as controlled test materials.
- Confirmation of how RDS treats 320x480 in their report workflow.
- Whether the am730-style page should show all three placements together or split into one slide per placement.
- Exact GDN/ad-choice button appearance requirement, if they need pixel-level match.
- Any negative/sensitive news categories to avoid.
- 1–3 past approved screencap reports for visual matching, if shareable.
- Rich media ad-server preview links or HTML5 ZIPs for Phase 2 only.
- Whether video screenshots are mandatory for every interactive/rich media placement.
Next step
Keep the website focused on the proof sample. The WhatsApp follow-up is handled separately in chat, not embedded on this page.
What we need to turn this into the proper RDS pack
Confirm campaign metadata, landing URL, approved publisher URLs, and report/template preference. Then Agent88 can map the successful placement samples into the final RDS-style report format for human review.